Can Nepal’s Startup Loans Truly Empower Entrepreneurs?
By Anjana Chaudhary - Jul 2, 2025 | Updated On: 02 July, 2025 | 5 min read
By Anjana Chaudhary , 5 min read - Jul 2, 2025
Updated On: 02 July, 2025

Over the last few years, the Nepalese government has made it easier to introduce Startup Loans to support startups, driving innovation and economic growth in the face of the nation’s changing business environment.
Government agencies and financial institutions have also established special startup loan schemes to finance entrepreneurs, valuing their potential and promoting national entrepreneurship through government-sanctioned loans.
These funding sources aim to provide much-needed financial support but have yet to demonstrate that they can effectively empower business owners. Do Nepal’s startup loans meet expectations, or can they help aspiring business owners?
Startup Funding in Nepal: Breaking Down the Rs 1 Billion Government Loan Scheme
Nepal’s Rs. 1 billion Startup Business Loan Programme is a collateral-free loan scheme offering loans of up to Rs 2.5 million at an interest rate of just 3%. The initiative commenced in 2023-24 A.D. by the government to encourage early-stage businesses in a market where conventional loans are difficult to approve. The scheme disbursed around Rs . 190 million during its first year, and Rs. 1 billion has been approved for the year 2081-82 B.S.
Despite the strong demand of more than 5,000 applicants with 661 approvals by the program, several challenges remain. Bureaucratic delays, Kathmandu-centric processes, and vague startup definitions of businesses limit the effectiveness of Nepal’s Startup Loans. Many genuine startups do not qualify, while traditional businesses exploit the scheme for their gain.
While funding startups is a good start towards encouraging entrepreneurship, money is far from enough. Startups require mentoring, market access, and technical assistance, none of which are currently present. To be truly effective, the Nepali government must simplify processes, decentralize access to the scheme, and build a proper startup ecosystem around the loan scheme, targeting young and new entrepreneurs.
Who Really Qualifies for Nepal’s Startup Loans?
Nepal’s Startup Loans aim to support Nepali startup founders aged 18-60 who have a registered enterprise under 10 years old and an annual turnover of under ₹150 million. The most crucial criterion for eligibility, as per the government, is to demonstrate “innovation.” However, this is ambiguous in practice and definition, as the guidelines lack sector-specific definitions
While designed to support high-growth ventures, these technical criteria often exclude promising traditional businesses that don’t fit conventional startup methods, leaving them behind.
In practice, the program clearly shows distinct biases towards the basic digital adopters in urban areas as they tend to qualify more easily than high-potential traditional businesses, particularly in the agricultural sector.
Due to better access to banks and documentation requirements that typically disadvantage rural entrepreneurs, applicants residing in Kathmandu dominate approvals. As such, the rural areas do not get a fair opportunity to submit their applications.
The current system overlooks numerous promising initiatives that affect Nepal’s economy and industry, favoring those that use financial incentives and straightforward arguments.
READ MORE: Nepal’s First Fiber Cement Board Plant Opens with Backing from IME Group
Public Sector Startup Lending Program: 3% Interest, But Is It Enough?
The artificial market distortion caused by the subsidized rate of 3% may deter private leaders from getting into the market. This can unintentionally hinder the growth of a competitive financial sector, particularly for startups, and make business owners entirely reliant on government funding.
On the surface, the 3% rate gives borrowers utterly unrealistic projections for long-term borrowing expenses. The majority of entrepreneurs will struggle to transition to market-rate lending. When they borrow more money in the market, they will experience a “cliff effect.”
The program’s financial viability is questionable at best. Similar initiatives in other developing nations have shown that ultra-low-interest loans frequently result in high-interest default rates due to a lack of business mentoring and market assistance for young entrepreneurs. In Nepal’s current financial framework, each of these components is noticeably absent.
The Hidden Challenges Beyond Cheap Loans
Although they provide financial relief, the discounted rates ignore vital operational deficiencies. Despite having access to funds, only 23% of loan clients have received professional business training, according to a 2023 study by Nepal Rastra Bank. This results in inefficient capital allocation.
Nepal’s Startup Loans program lacks vital post-disbursement support. Unlike developed ecosystems, it provides no structured mentorship support or market linkages, leaving startups unprepared for scaling issues in future challenges that cheap loans alone can’t solve.
More crucially, unaddressed market barriers undermine success. Up-and-coming entrepreneurs report predatory competition, regulatory ambiguities, and weak IP protections. These structural issues are more damaging than financing costs, yet they are often excluded from current government policy solutions.
From Application to Impact: Making Startup Funding in Nepal Work for Entrepreneurs
Nepal’s startup loans are in dire need of digital applications and private sector reviewers to reduce bureaucracy and improve decision-making. The current Kathmandu-based process followed by the program not only excludes viable rural businesses but also overlooks their potential contribution to innovation.
In place of the centralized funding process, sectoral loan mechanisms are more effectively used to attract entrepreneurs from various regions. Tech startups and agricultural companies require different support mechanisms but are subject to identical requirements today.
The program must be able to track measurable outcomes such as work generation and revenue growth. Without such proper impact studies, key public investments can wind up supporting inconsequential businesses rather than driving actual economic transformation.
Did you notice an error ?
Please help us make corrections by submitting a suggestion. Your help is greatly appreciated!